The Congressional Budget Office said that the Graham-Cassidy bill would save enough against the federal deficit to move forward, but gave little other detail.
The Congressional Budget Office on Monday released its score for the latest attempt by Republicans in the Senate to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act.
But the score for the plan, known as the Graham-Cassidy bill, is limited in scope due to the short timeframe in which the CBO had to produce it. The score released Monday only includes the budgetary effects of the bill.
The office projected that the Graham-Cassidy bill would reduce the federal deficit through 2026 by more than the $133 billion in savings from the House's American Health Care Act.
The bill was required to save as much or more than the House bill to qualify under the procedure known as budget reconciliation, which allows Republicans to bypass a Democratic filibuster and pass a bill with a simple majority.
The CBO score only, however, provided a vague assessment of the insurance coverage impacts of the bill.
"The number of people with comprehensive health insurance that covers high-cost medical events would be reduced by millions compared with the baseline projections for each year during the decade, CBO and JCT estimate," said the CBO's report. "That number could vary widely depending on how states implemented the legislation, although the direction of the effect is clear."
Independent analyses from by the Brookings Institution and the Commonwealth Fund estimated that the bill would result in up to 18 million more uninsured through 2019 and 21 million more uninsured through 2026 if signed into law.
Additionally, since the Graham-Cassidy bill would shift federal healthcare funding in 2020 to block grants (lump sums paid up front every year based on the number of people enrolled in certain programs), it would require states to develop and implement virtually an entire new health system in just two years. Such a short timeframe, experts say, could cause chaos in health insurance markets.
The CBO said it would need "at least several weeks" to produce a more comprehensive score of the bill.
Due to these analyses, combined with the massive amounts of federal assistance cut in the bill, GOP leaders have not been encouraged about the legislation's prospects. Two GOP members — Rand Paul and John McCain — have formally announced their intentions to vote against the bill. Several others from across the conference have also expressed misgivings.
Only two Republican senators can vote against the bill for it to pass.
The Congressional Budget Office said that the Graham-Cassidy bill would save enough against the federal deficit to move forward, but gave little other detail. Read Full Story
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Instagram
Google+
YouTube
LinkedIn
RSS