Dear Managers, this is why digital marketers can’t be micromanaged

By Samuel Kwabena ANSONG

Micromanaging a digital marketer can be detrimental to the success of a marketing campaign and the overall performance of the digital marketer. Digital marketing is a dynamic field that requires flexibility, creativity, and autonomy to be effective. Micro-managing can stifle these qualities and lead to a lack of innovation and effectiveness in marketing efforts.

One of the main reasons why micromanaging a digital marketer is not effective is that it can stifle creativity and innovation. Digital marketing is constantly evolving and requires new and creative ideas to be successful. When a digital marketer is constantly told what to do and how to do it, they may not feel empowered to come up with new and innovative ideas. This can lead to a lack of fresh and creative content, which can negatively impact the effectiveness of the marketing campaign.

Another negative effect of micromanaging a digital marketer is that it can lead to a lack of ownership and initiative. Digital marketing requires the ability to think strategically, make decisions, and take ownership of marketing efforts. When a digital marketer is constantly monitored and directed, they may not feel motivated to take ownership of their work and may become dependent on their manager for guidance. This can lead to a lack of initiative and accountability, which can negatively impact the overall performance of the digital marketer.

Micro-managing a digital marketer can also lead to inefficiency and wasted time. Digital marketing requires a lot of testing, experimentation, and data analysis to be effective. When a manager is constantly providing detailed instructions and monitoring the digital marketer’s work, they may be duplicating the work that the digital marketer is already doing, which can lead to delays and increased workloads. This can also lead to a lack of focus on the manager’s own responsibilities and tasks.

Additionally, micromanaging a digital marketer can lead to high turnover rates. Digital marketers may become frustrated with the lack of trust and autonomy and may choose to leave the company for a more empowering work environment. This can lead to a loss of valuable talent and expertise, which can negatively impact the overall performance of the marketing team.

On the other hand, digital marketing requires a lot of monitoring and data analysis. Managers should provide clear goals and objectives, but also give the digital marketer freedom to work independently and come up with their own strategies and tactics to achieve those goals. This approach allows the digital marketer to think strategically, make decisions, and take ownership of the marketing efforts, which can lead to more effective and efficient marketing campaigns.

In conclusion, micromanaging a digital marketer can have negative effects on the success of a marketing campaign and the overall performance of the digital marketer. Managers should strive to find a balance between close supervision and autonomy for their digital marketers and should give them the freedom to think independently and make decisions while still providing guidance and support when necessary. This approach will lead to more effective and efficient marketing campaigns and a more motivated and productive digital marketer.

Link to LinkedIn Post: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/dear-managers-why-digital-marketers-cant-micromanaged-samuel-ansong?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios&utm_campaign=share_via

The writer is a Digital Marketing Professional
Email: [email protected]
Phone Number: 0240835458

The post Dear Managers, this is why digital marketers can’t be micromanaged appeared first on The Business & Financial Times.

Read Full Story