Understanding oil palm policy trajectory: A historical review of gov’t interventions and their unrealised potential

By Raymond DENTEH; an Agribusiness Enthusiast

This article marks the beginning of a three-part analytical series examining Ghana’s oil palm sector through the lens of public policy performance, investment choices, institutional behaviour, and long-term structural outcomes. It provides:

• Part I: A historical and comparative review of Government-led oil palm policies and investments, beginning with Ghana’s early sector ambitions, through the Presidential Special Initiative on Oil Palm (PSI – 2001 to 2008), and the structural weaknesses that limited their impact.
• Part II: A deeper analysis of the lessons learned from the past—drawing on the failures of PSI, the chronic losses within state-owned enterprises (SOEs), and Ghana’s wider public investment culture—and how the new National Policy on Integrated Oil Palm Development (2026–2032) attempts to correct these weaknesses.
• Part III: A proposed set of practical, tested models drawn from field evidence, successful outgrower schemes, artisanal-mill upgrading programmes, and global best practice—models that can anchor Ghana’s next phase of oil palm transformation.

Together, the series provides a policy-focused, evidence-based examination of Ghana’s oil palm sector and offers a roadmap for developing a competitive, inclusive, and sustainable industry.

The Historical Context: From Global Giant to Import-Dependent Nation

Ghana was once a global powerhouse in palm oil production. In the 19th century, the country was one of the world’s major exporters of crude palm oil, supplying Europe and powering coastal economies. By the mid-20th century, the oil palm had become a core source of livelihood, integrated into food systems, cultural practices, and rural commerce.

Yet decades of inconsistent policy direction, fragmented investments, weak institutional coordination, and insufficient private-sector integration gradually eroded Ghana’s competitive advantage. Despite its favourable climate and vast agro-ecological suitability, Ghana today imports between 250,000 and 400,000 tonnes of palm oil products annually. The result is a paradox: resource abundance but structural dependency.

This context set the stage for the country’s most ambitious government-led intervention—the Presidential Special Initiative on Oil Palm.

The Presidential Special Initiative on Oil Palm (2001–2008): Ambition Without Alignment

The PSI was designed as a national flagship to reposition oil palm as an export commodity, create rural jobs, and restore Ghana’s dominance. It had political visibility, widespread public backing, and strong presidential advocacy.

Achievements That Should Not Be Dismissed

The initiative did make progress:

• It contributed to around 20,000 hectares of new plantings, especially among smallholders.
• It renewed national interest in the oil palm sector.
• It strengthened early partnerships with mills and development actors.
• It produced important agronomic, geographic, and socio-economic data.

However, the PSI significantly under-performed relative to its ambitious targets. It neither expanded hectarage at the projected scale nor catalysed the processing capacity required to power large-scale industrialisation.

The reasons for this underperformance illuminate Ghana’s recurring public sector challenges.

Why the PSI underperformed: Structural Failures of Policy Execution — With Lessons

 Over-Ambitious targets without matching finance and capacity

The PSI aimed for rapid national expansion but lacked:
• Dedicated patient capital
• Long-term financing instruments
• Adequate extension services
• Institutional capacity at the district level

Targets were aspirational rather than grounded in financial or operational realities.

Lesson: Large-scale agricultural programmes must be built on realistic, evidence-based targets backed by secured long-term financing and strong institutional capacity, and they must be insulated from political interference to reduce corruption, patronage-driven distortions, and implementation inefficiencies.

 Weak Multi-Agency Coordination

The PSI involved MoFA, MOTI, district assemblies, and private actors, but no single coordinating entity provided leadership or accountability. This reproduced the same fragmentation seen across Ghana’s SOEs.

Lesson: Value-chain programmes need one empowered coordinating authority with clear mandates, reporting lines, and decision-making power.

 Politicisation of Programme Delivery

Political timelines encouraged quick wins—especially mass seedling distribution—while neglecting:
• Processing infrastructure
• Market linkages
• Long-term agronomic planning

Lesson: Agricultural policies must be insulated from electoral cycles, with continuity commitments that prevent technical programmes from becoming political projects.

 Seedling Distribution without post-planting support or processing capacity

Seedlings were distributed widely, but the Government did not provide post-planting support during the oil palm’s long gestation period. Extension, input financing, and maintenance support were limited. Processing mills, feeder roads, and storage were inadequate, leaving many farmers stranded once trees matured.

Lesson: For perennial crops, seedling distribution must be backed by a full post-planting strategy—covering maintenance finance, extension, processing, logistics, and guaranteed off-take.

Weak Smallholder Integration and Support Systems

Outgrower schemes lacked:
• Standardised contracts
• Transparent pricing
• Consistent extension
• Input-credit arrangements

This left smallholders vulnerable and disengaged.

Lesson: Outgrower systems must be structured, transparent, and enforceable, ensuring farmers have predictable support and fair commercial terms.

Administrative and Institutional Weaknesses

District-level departments were understaffed, under-resourced, and slow to act. Weak procurement systems, leadership turnover, and poor accountability mirrored the challenges seen in many SOEs.

Lesson: Agricultural transformation requires strong institutions, not just funding—capacity, governance, M&E, and procurement discipline are critical.

 Neglect of Artisanal Processors

Despite producing over 60% of Ghana’s crude palm oil, artisanal processors received almost no support under PSI. Without upgrading this segment, the value chain could not scale.

Lesson: Inclusive sector development must integrate SMEs and artisanal processors, upgrading technology and quality to build a competitive national supply base.

 Political Economy Constraints

Land disputes, elite interests, patronage networks, and contestation around mills and contracts undermined programme execution—similar to governance failures in SOEs.

Lesson: Technical design must be paired with political-economy strategies to manage vested interests, land dynamics, and governance risks.

 A Mixed Legacy

Although PSI lost momentum by 2007–2008, it delivered:
• Expanded smallholder plantings
• Renewed policy focus
• Useful sector data and experience

These foundations shaped the thinking behind the new National Policy on Integrated Oil Palm Development.

Lesson: Even underperforming programmes generate valuable institutional learning, which must inform future policy design and implementation.

Conclusion of Part I – Setting the Stage for Reform

The PSI represented a bold attempt at national transformation, but its design flaws, financing gaps, institutional fragmentation, and dependence on political cycles prevented it from achieving its intended impact. When placed alongside the persistent failures within Ghana’s SOE landscape, the PSI offers invaluable lessons for how not to run a strategic commodity programme.

Part II of this series will therefore examine how the new 2026–2032 policy must attempt to correct these weaknesses, and what Ghana must do to finally build a resilient, competitive, and sustainable oil palm economy.

Part III will then propose practical, evidence-based models—including outgrower schemes, artisanal mill upgrading systems, and cluster-based development—that Ghana can adopt to secure long-term sector transformation.

 Raymond is an Agribusiness Enthusiast

The post Understanding oil palm policy trajectory: A historical review of gov’t interventions and their unrealised potential appeared first on The Business & Financial Times.

Read Full Story